Gansu: Candidates Who Cheat In Mathematics In The College Entrance Examination Are Not Allowed To Take The Follow-up Examination Because Their Scores Are Invalid

take 15 minutes to read
Home News Main article

Today is the second day of the 2022 national college entrance examination. In response to the "cheating of Gansu examinee in national college entrance examination mathematics volume B", today (June 8), the staff of Gansu Provincial Education Examination Institute replied that the examinee's mathematics score was invalid, and the examinee would no longer be able to take the follow-up college entrance examination. Gansu Provincial Education Examination Institute is further handling the situation and will issue a notice in time.

Gansu Education Examination Institute said the student would no longer take the follow-up exam

On the afternoon of June 7, after the math exam of the national college entrance examination, some netizens exposed several QQ chat screenshots. The screenshots showed that a netizen with the nickname pursue zhangruiruirui posted help information in the group: "who can do senior three problems, math, do me a favor, I can pay..." and attached many photos of suspected math problems in the test paper. The reporter noted that the netizen initially released information in the group at 15:48. Later, a number of netizens in the group who claimed to be candidates for this year's college entrance examination pointed out that the above topic was the national volume B topic of Mathematics for this year's college entrance examination.

In response to the above situation, on June 8, the Education Examination Institute of the Ministry of Education issued a circular saying that after rapid investigation by the public security organ, it is now found that: the national mathematics test paper B was involved, and the Department cheated in the exam. A candidate in Gansu entered the exam room with his mobile phone in violation of regulations. After the exam, he took the test paper and sent it to QQ group for answers, but failed. There was no question leakage before the exam.

According to the above circular, the relevant local educational examination institutions have replaced the invigilators of the test sites involved, strengthened the invigilators, and will seriously deal with the illegal candidates and the dereliction of duty and responsibility in accordance with the provisions of the measures for the handling of violations of national educational examinations.

On June 8, the staff of Gansu Education Examination Institute replied that the candidate's math score was invalid, and the candidate would no longer be able to participate in the follow-up college entrance examination. Gansu Education Examination Institute is further handling the situation and will issue a notice in time.

Lawyer: cheating in exams may constitute a crime

The reporter of the Beijing News noted that the measures for handling violations of national education examination revised and issued by the Ministry of education in 2012 clearly states that if a candidate violates the principles of fairness and impartiality in the examination and finds one of the following behaviors during the examination or during or after the examination, the relevant candidate shall be deemed to have cheated in the examination, These behaviors include "taking materials related to the examination contents or electronic devices storing materials related to the examination contents to participate in the examination", "carrying devices with the function of sending or receiving information" and "other behaviors of obtaining or trying to obtain the answers to the examination questions and examination results by improper means". Those who have one of the cheating behaviors listed in the law shall register for each stage of the examination The scores of each subject are invalid; For those who take the self-study examination of higher education, the results of each subject in the current examination are invalid.

At the same time, Article 9 of the measures for the handling of violations of national education examination clearly states that "under any of the following circumstances, participants may be suspended from participating in the examination for 1 to 3 years depending on the seriousness of the circumstances; if the circumstances are particularly serious, participants may be suspended from participating in various national education examinations for 1 to 3 years at the same time. These circumstances include" sending and transmitting information about examination questions outside the examination room "and" using relevant equipment to receive information to cheat ".

Article 30 of the measures for handling violations of national education examinations also stipulates that education examination institutions shall establish integrity files for candidates of national education examinations, and record and retain relevant information about those who cheat in national education examinations. No organization or individual may delete or change the information recorded in the integrity files of candidates for the national education examination without going through legal procedures. National education examination candidates' integrity files can be inquired by relevant social parties according to their applications, and relevant information shall be provided to the enrollment schools or units in a timely manner as reference conditions for enrollment.

Cheating in examinations may even constitute a crime. In article 284 of the criminal law, the crime of organizing cheating, the crime of illegally selling and providing test questions and answers, and the crime of substituting for examinations are stipulated for cheating in examinations. If a crime is constituted, criminal responsibility shall be borne according to law.

Pengyanjun, a lawyer from Beijing Changhong law firm, believes that if the perpetrator sells or provides test questions and answers belonging to state secrets to others in order to cheat in the examination, if the circumstances are serious, it will constitute the crime of illegally selling or providing test questions and answers, as well as the crime of deliberately divulging state secrets. It is a joinder of offenses and should be judged from the same point of view.

Lawyer pengyanjun said that according to the currently disclosed information, it is not yet possible to confirm whether the candidate's cheating is an organized cheating. According to the relevant laws and regulations on the crime of organizing examination cheating, those who organize cheating in the national examination stipulated by law shall be sentenced to fixed-term imprisonment of not more than three years or criminal detention and shall also, or shall only, be fined; If the circumstances are serious, he shall be sentenced to fixed-term imprisonment of not less than three years but not more than seven years and shall also be fined.

"He may also commit a crime of divulging state secrets by photographing the title in this way. If the child is under the age of 18, there are no serious consequences. He can deal with it lightly. He has a long way to go and give the child a chance." Lawyer pengyanjun believes that China's criminal law stipulates that a person who has reached the age of 14 but not the age of 18 should be given a lighter or mitigated punishment for a crime.

In addition, the reporter noted that during the college entrance examination in 2021, a similar situation occurred. At that time, the official notice said that when entering the examination room for security check, a candidate hid his mobile phone in his thin clothes, raised his hands to avoid the security check, and illegally brought his mobile phone into the examination room. In the exam, the mobile phone was hidden under the draft paper to shoot the questions, and the questions were sent to a training institution 46 minutes after the exam (no answer).

At that time, Wuhan Huangpi District Bureau of Education issued a notice in response to the incident, saying that after investigation, Wu, a candidate, illegally entered the examination room with a mobile phone to shoot test papers, and the invigilators were negligent in entrance security inspection and invigilation. The illegal candidates will be disqualified from the examination, and the results of each stage and subject they have registered for the examination will be invalid, and further treatment will be made according to the follow-up investigation results.

"Disinfectant" Counterfeiting: Toxic Methanol Is Sold On Multiple E-commerce Platforms As Alcohol
« Prev 06-08
Aibiying Is Accused Of Cheating Consumers By Australian Regulators
Next » 06-08