Recently, when emphasizing the advantages of a card, amd executives pointed out that AMD graphics card is much ahead of its competitors in terms of cost performance, among which RX 6400 graphics card is the most advanced. Compared with NVIDIA's GTX 1050 Ti graphics card, the cost performance is 89% higher and the energy consumption ratio is 122%.
Why did amd use its latest RX 6400 graphics card to crush the GTX 1050 Ti graphics card of NVIDIA in previous years? This is not all AMD's cunning, because there are really no decent products in the thousand yuan graphics card of N card. The price of RTX 3050 is 1899 yuan, which is actually 2000 yuan or higher. GTX 1650 is not cheap now.
Under the pressure of Rx 6400, NVIDIA really needs a new entry-level unique display. Therefore, it is reported that NVIDIA has prepared GTX 1630 graphics card to benchmark RX 6400
The detailed specification of GTX 1630 graphics card is unknown, but it is impossible to use ampere architecture. It should be based on tu117 core, but it is much weaker than GTX 1650 with the same core. The number of CUDA cores is less than 865, and the video memory bit width will be cut to 64bit. Fortunately, gddr6 can make up for some losses.
*Of course, the GTX 1630 graphics card will not support optical tracing and DLSS *. Don't think so much about the entry-level graphics card. If it supports DLSS, it will obviously affect the sales of GTX 1650 graphics card.
As for the price, GTX 1630 should also be similar to RX 6400, or even cheaper. After all, one is a mature product with 7Nm process and the other is a mature product with 12NM process. The cost is much worse. Maybe it is the next thousand yuan bright card artifact.