Virginia will lift the ban on the use of facial recognition by local police in July, while California and New Orleans will "press the Cancel button" as soon as this month.
Homicides in New Orleans have risen 67% over the past two years, and police say they need every viable device.
"Solving these crimes requires technology and holding people accountable," Shaun Ferguson, the police commissioner, told reporters. He called on the City Council to repeal a ban that came into force last year,
From New York and Colorado to West Lafayette, Indiana, efforts to put the ban in place are encountering resistance in large and small jurisdictions. Even Vermont, the last state to have a nearly 100% ban on the use of facial recognition technology by police, cut content in its legislation last year to allow the investigation of juvenile sexual crimes.
From 2019 to 2021, more than 20 U.S. state or local governments have issued legal norms restricting facial recognition. The study found that this technology is much less efficient in identifying blacks, and the anti police "black lives matter" protest provided impetus for this debate.
However, the analysis being conducted by the National Institute of standards and technology of the federal government has proved important progress in accuracy in the whole industry. In a test last month, the U.S. Department of Homeland Security found that people of different skin colors and genders had little difference in accuracy.
"More and more people are curious about the use of technology by the president of Parker's Association to deal with issues related to safety and discrimination," said Jake.
The change of mood may make its members, including Clearview AI, idea and Motorola solutions, spend $124 billion a year on policing by state and local governments to obtain a higher share. The parts devoted to technology are not closely followed.
This week, Clearview settled a privacy lawsuit over its collection of photos from social media by agreeing not to promote its flagship system to the U.S. personal sector.
Clearview, which helps police find matches in social media messages, said it welcomed "any regulation that helps society get the best possible benefits from facial recognition technology while limiting potential disadvantages". Idemia and Motorola provided matching information from the authorities' database, and they declined to comment.
Although the latest research has eased legislators' reservations, the debate continues. The General Services Administration, which oversees federal contractors, said in a report released last month that the main facial recognition tools were not commensurate with African Americans in the assessment. The company did not respond to a request for details of the test.
Facial recognition can be reviewed by the president's newly established national Artificial Intelligence Advisory Committee, which began forming a subgroup last week to understand its use in policing.
The first in the United States
The state of Virginia has authorized its ban through a program that restricts access to facial recognition builders. This year, the company's lobbyists are ready to push the law to better balance the freedom of specific people and the investigative needs of the police, said state senator Scott surovell.
From July 1, the police can use facial recognition instruments with 98% or higher accuracy in no less than one NIST examination, with the smallest demographic difference.
NIST declined to comment, citing compliance with the law under discussion.
Technical critics mentioned that this practice is goodwill, but not perfect, and must require authorization for the use of face recognition.
OS Keyes, a researcher at Ada Lovelace at the University of Washington, said: "solving the problem of discriminatory policing through repeated inspection algorithms is a bit like trying to solve police brutality by checking whether guns are racist: strictly speaking, it is higher than choice, but the real deficiency is the specific person holding guns."
Real time surveillance is prohibited in Virginia, and face matching cannot be a possible trigger for an arrest warrant. Abuse may lead to misdemeanors.
Lobbyist Parker said the legislation was "the first legislation in the United States to require the accuracy of facial recognition technology used by law enforcement agencies to be evaluated by the U.S. government" and "the strictest use algorithm in the United States".
Former Virginia representative lashrecse Aird, who led last year's legislation, said that this year's company needed a model to beat the ban in the United States. "They think it ensures a higher sense of responsibility - it's progress, but I don't know," she said
It stands in stark contrast to a Washington state legislation that requires companies to conduct their own assessments in advance "under operational conditions".
"Moments of crisis"
In 2019, California banned police from using facial recognition on unit devices such as portable cameras. However, due to the addition of a provision by state senators, the ban expired on January 1.
Jennifer Jones, a worker lawyer for the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) in Northern California, said that now, the increasing information experience on Retail Theft and vandalism cases has attracted the attention of legislators. As a result, ACLU encountered resistance from law enforcement to make the ban permanent.
"The police department is using people's fear of this crime to accumulate more energy. It has been many years and we have seen new applied science promoted in times of disaster," Jones said
Activists in New York City are also pressing for a ban on facial recognition, despite rising crime rates. Eric Adams, who became mayor in January, mentioned a month later that it could be used safely under current guidelines, while former New York Mayor bill debracio said additional warnings were needed.
In sirafayet, officials have not issued a facial recognition ban twice in the past six months, citing its value in the investigation. "It's a bit shortsighted to ban it or abandon its application," said Mayor John Dennis, a former police officer.
David Sanders, the city councilor behind the ban, said concerns about deteriorating morale among police officers "dominated the response".
After the defeat in Virginia, the civil liberties team continued to upgrade in New Orleans. Ten national organizations suggested in the last week that lawmakers strengthen rather than repeal their ban on the possibility of false arrest based mainly on flawed identification. The local organization eye on surveillance mentioned that New Orleans "cannot go backwards".